Watching the fallout from the recent decision by the scouts to change their membership policy. The decision was a compromise that was thought to preserve/extend the program. National thinking that the decision would satisfy the majority and get the corporate donors back.
The words of the compromise have been about inclusion, they push ” Duty to God” back to the unit level. I have one group of dedicated volunteers that see the program crumbling, their mainstream denominations with a definition of sin that conflicts with a litigious group wanting inclusion. Good people who have given their time and talent in what they have always viewed as an extension of their ministry, are leaving the program. These people are not backwoods bigots, they are main same middle America. They are the living examples of Duty to God & Country. They believe the program change conflicts with their core beliefs.
I don’t know the percentage of youth that have been denied participation in the program. The original policy was aimed solely on the primary adult leadership and somehow over the past ten years this has refocused on any member youth or adult.
Some of the folks wanting change are not satisfied with the compromise. For them it does not go far enough. They want full inclusion for their “open and avowed”, regardless of the conflict with the Churches that sponsor the vast majority of the units. I am afraid that the next set of battles, will be framed on God being the problem to be removed from the program, so that the atheists and open and avowed can have full access.
Then there those of us still in the program, trying to find the balance. To be sure that the program/ministry is provided to all youth, but also maintaining the core values of the Chartering unit, the Church and the Scout Council. Youth protection will still be youth protection. We are still going to screen our unit leadership. They will have to live within the precepts of the Church.
None of us are perfect. But, we are still responsible to be sure that we as adults conduct ourselves in a manner that does not distract or disrupt the program.
Most of us have not spent a great deal of time having to define or discuss our core values. There will be many of us doing just this in the days ahead. This is not a bad thing. I come from a credal denomination, I am comfortable professing my beliefs. It may not be as easy for others, but they too should have a voice. It is going to be a challenging time ahead for us.